Battlefield 3 and PAX East 2011 Summary

A place to talk about games in general
Post Reply
User avatar
[JiF]Rhykin
JiF Member
Posts: 525
Joined: Tue Dec 12, 2006 9:25 pm
Location: USA
Contact:

Battlefield 3 and PAX East 2011 Summary

Post by [JiF]Rhykin »

Ah! Finally back at my house after spending 3 days in Boston for PAX East (http://east.paxsite.com/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;). The convention was at a much bigger location, the Boston Convention and Exhibition Center (versus the Hynes Convention Center of last year). The new location meant a much larger show floor, around 4 times bigger if I had to take a quick estimate. The only other soul I ran into that many of you here would know was noxin from LPANE. I didn't see pissboy, although I was keeping an eye for him. There were probably a few BDU chaps wandering the convention, but unfortunately I'm not familiar with many of them.

None the less, for those of you that do not know what PAX is, well, it's the Penny Arcade Expo! It takes place twice a year, once on the west coast and once on the east coast. This is the second year they have held the convention on the east coast. The centerpiece of the convention is the exhibition floor where developers/publishers/vendors/retrogaming shops come and display their in-development creations.

Image Image Image

The majority of booths allowed you to walk right up and play the game, even though the game may be a few months out from being completed. Some of the more prominent demos and games include (but not limited to): Battlefield 3 (Of course!), Portal 2, L.A. Noire, Duke Nukem Forever, Homefront, and many, many more (see pictures!). The latter two allowed you to walk right up and play, while the former were closed room demonstrations. Besides the exhibition hall, there were many panels going on through out the day, from sites like Wired, GiantBomb, Kotaku, Joystiq, Penny Arcade, etc, on a wide variety of subjects. There was a massive table-top gaming area where you could play board and card games. There were also modern console, classic console, and PC free-play rooms where you can simply walk in, sit down, and just play whatever games they had available. LANFest was also taking place at the time, and was in its own room in the convention, but the tickets sold out pretty quick so I wasn't able to get in (the BDU gents were probably hanging out in there). Most importantly, there was a room filled with classic arcade machines (from Funspot in NH), and I spent a good amount of time wandering through and playing the machines.

However, back to the exhibition hall; All the content there was great. The hall was much better than last years, mostly due to the larger number of publishers and vendors that were present. I picked up a couple games one of the few retrogaming booths, but wasn't anything significant. One of the more prominent stores to show up was a Japanese import shop from New York City. However, I didn't pick up anything there as I purchased nearly all my desired Japanese games and consoles when I was in Japan back in November of last year.

As far as demoes are concerned, I didn't play around with many of the games, only a couple indie titles. This is merely my personal preference as I don't like downloadable single-player demos in general (as I feel it spoils the game when I do decide to go through it). The only closed-room demonstration I waited in line for (as the lines were 2+ hours long) was Battlefield 3.

Image

I would've broken my demo exception if they had something available for play, but it was live-play through by a product marketer or developer. Anyway, time to get to the interesting part (Note that this probably contains "spoilers" for future marketing content that they'll release in either the coming days or months):

The demonstration was done in an enclosed room, seating around 25 people at a time, and was approximately 20 to 25 minutes long. They had a large LCD in front with what I would assume was a nice 5.1/7.1 sound system (forgot to check) in the room. The demonstration appeared to be live and being played by the developer. I was sort of distracted at times trying to see if he was actually playing it, or if it was a video and he was mockingly going along with it (I have no idea why I would think the latter, probably because it looked freaking amazing). Anyway, the demonstration was a play-through from what appeared to be from the beginning of the game, or at least a mission, and jumping through the mission in 3 different segments. The first segment is actually the same play through that DICE released the trailer for a couple weeks ago. It had some extra content in the beginning, mostly some additional text explaining the situation (which was still vague), and some harassment between the soldiers before the vehicle stopped and they got out. At this point, it was pretty much the exact same as the trailer for the next 7 or 8 minutes. During the whole demo, the sound quality was amazing. Granted, this was probably my first time in front of a decent sound system while watching an FPS being played, but I was surprised by the many different sounds and the audible level that they were at (very loud). Definitely gave it a more "realistic" feel to it. (Side note: If anyone subscribes to Game Informer, the magazine went into more detail about the audio and the effort DICE has made to kick it up a notch).

The animations of the soldiers throughout the entire demo were excellent. This is one of those things that significantly irks me if the studio does it poorly. I certainly don't mind the animations of old games because every animation was at least consistent in its complexity. There have been many recent games where there's one amazing animation (e.g. sprinting), but then the transition to or next animation is a complete failure, causing it to be incredibly distracting to gameplay. While there is some refinement that needs to take place, what I have seen has been pretty good in that category. The only exception to this is the facial animations, although that's mostly due to absurd expectations set by L.A. Noire and Half Life 2. They're certainly not horrid, and actually pretty decent, but don't match up with the quality of the other animations mentioned.

The demonstration continued past the Part 1 trailer with a little more fighting before the soldiers retreated back in the direction they arrived. The second part involved a soldier following a red wire through a building (suspected IED) and down into the basement. I won't go into too much detail about it but this part demonstrated hand to hand combat, which was fairly interesting to watch. It's mostly scripted play, prompting you to hit various buttons, much like Fahrenheit (although much less frequently).

The third part involved a open-space firefight (still single player), mostly demonstrating the physics aspects of the Frostbite 2 engine, via breaking stone, falling panels, exploding cars, etc. The engine being used in the game is the new Frostbite 2.0 engine that DICE has been refining since BF:BC1 was released. The demo continued until the end when an earthquake struck (which was subtly mentioned by soldiers throughout the demo) and caused the environment to crumble down. (Unfortunate situation that the studio has been placed in to demonstrate the engine's capabilities given the events that occurred in Japan, so please excuse me when I say that this particular scene was fairly impressive).

In the end, they only showcased Single-player, and not any Multiplayer unfortunately. Although, they indicated that multiplayer is their number one priority. They also mentioned that this is a PC game first, console game second (not in those exact words, but this is also the spin they've been publicly indicating now for a while).

I'm certainly looking forward to this game, and it'll be the one that I'll finally be building a new computer for (as I only have laptops left!). I'll be pre-ordering it soon for PC as I am ashamed to say that I haven't done that yet. Feel free to ask any questions about the demo or PAX!

Cheers!
Image
User avatar
[JiF]Sgt Shellshocked
Forum User
Posts: 1132
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2009 1:41 am
Location: UK

Re: Battlefield 3 and PAX East 2011 Summary

Post by [JiF]Sgt Shellshocked »

Hey Rhykin thanks for sharing that with us :)
User avatar
[JiF]pop51
Forum User
Posts: 251
Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2008 2:13 am
Location: Indianapolis Indiana US

Re: Battlefield 3 and PAX East 2011 Summary

Post by [JiF]pop51 »

Great review thanks Rhykin :wave:
User avatar
Gnome-father
Forum User
Posts: 521
Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2009 2:05 pm
Location: Norway, Bødalen

Re: Battlefield 3 and PAX East 2011 Summary

Post by Gnome-father »

Great review, Rhykin! Too bad there's nothing new to me. :(
Last edited by Gnome-father on Mon Mar 14, 2011 2:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
[JiF]Buick
Forum User
Posts: 224
Joined: Thu Aug 24, 2006 1:34 pm
Location: Pennsylvania

Re: Battlefield 3 and PAX East 2011 Summary

Post by [JiF]Buick »

Awesome write-up Dan!
Did you spend any time at the Duke Nukem booth?
I was hoping to attend this PAX but it was sold out fast. I'm hoping to get to the next one (east)
since E3 will probably elude me ..... forever.
Last edited by [JiF]Buick on Mon Mar 14, 2011 5:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
[JiF]CowHide
Forum User
Posts: 366
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 10:10 pm
Location: Ontario, Canada
Contact:

Re: Battlefield 3 and PAX East 2011 Summary

Post by [JiF]CowHide »

Did they mention anything about System Requirements for the Frostbite 2.0 engine? I heard BF3 is gonna need a lot of power.
Image Image
"Moo Sarge, I said Mooooooooooooooooooooooooooo !!"
User avatar
[JiF]Uncle Stinky
Forum User
Posts: 1057
Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2007 1:42 pm
Location: Fairfax, Virginia

Re: Battlefield 3 and PAX East 2011 Summary

Post by [JiF]Uncle Stinky »

No pictures of Booth Babes? C'mon, man! :shock:
Image
User avatar
[JiF]Lt Gav
Forum User
Posts: 2168
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2007 1:00 am
Location: High Wycombe, England

Re: Battlefield 3 and PAX East 2011 Summary

Post by [JiF]Lt Gav »

Nice report there chap

Really looking forward to BF3 coming out!
Max
Forum User
Posts: 42
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2011 4:33 am
Location: bozeman, montana
Contact:

Re: Battlefield 3 and PAX East 2011 Summary

Post by Max »

system requirements are, must have direct x 10 or 11, which is not supported by windows xp. so you will have to get windows 7 (my choice) or vista. other than this i do not know of any other major requirements. just need as always good graphics card, much ram as possible( i have 4 gigs atm)
User avatar
Gnome-father
Forum User
Posts: 521
Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2009 2:05 pm
Location: Norway, Bødalen

Re: Battlefield 3 and PAX East 2011 Summary

Post by Gnome-father »

Max wrote:system requirements are, must have direct x 10 or 11, which is not supported by windows xp. so you will have to get windows 7 (my choice) or vista. other than this i do not know of any other major requirements. just need as always good graphics card, much ram as possible( i have 4 gigs atm)
The devs said we should get a 64bit OS, Quad Core CPU, Direct X 11 GPU and 4GB RAM.
User avatar
[JiF]Rhykin
JiF Member
Posts: 525
Joined: Tue Dec 12, 2006 9:25 pm
Location: USA
Contact:

Re: Battlefield 3 and PAX East 2011 Summary

Post by [JiF]Rhykin »

Sorry for the delay gents.
[JiF]Buick wrote:Awesome write-up Dan!
Did you spend any time at the Duke Nukem booth?
I was hoping to attend this PAX but it was sold out fast. I'm hoping to get to the next one (east)
since E3 will probably elude me ..... forever.
Best time to visit any of the booths is the first thing on the first day (while the keynote and secondary address go on). Lines are really short, but I didn't take advantage of the opportunity as much as I should have. Mostly swung by the 3DS booth and snagged some stuff from the stores before the lines got long and stuff was taken. I did visit the DNF booth early on and stood next to a guy and watched him play through the demo. I was going to try it out the second day, but the line was two hours (versus me just walking in early on the first day) and the only line I wanted to wait in that long for was the BF3 line :)
[JiF]CowHide wrote:Did they mention anything about System Requirements for the Frostbite 2.0 engine? I heard BF3 is gonna need a lot of power.
No, they didn't elaborate much on the system requirements. I think Gnome-father has them right judging by what I remember reading outside of PAX.
[JiF]Uncle Stinky wrote:No pictures of Booth Babes? C'mon, man! :shock:
Booth babes actually are banned from PAX. One of the PAX organizers described booth babes as "viruses that once let in, spread like mad."
Image
devnull
New User
Posts: 8
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 8:47 pm

Re: Battlefield 3 and PAX East 2011 Summary

Post by devnull »

hey Rhykin,

I wish I had known you were going. I was there with two buds at the BYOC event. I only met one other person that had also attended NorEaster Intel LanFest ...of course I have now forgotten their name. There were no BDU or JiF folks as far as I know. I have to say that the BYOC was poorly run....no Intel folks were actively present even though they sponsored it. The PAX Enforcer folks attempted to manage the event but it was an epic FAIL. Intel attended PAX but it was mainly to showcase SSD's. I did speak with them about the BYOC event issues. My friend did win an SSD at their Assassins Creed competition so he was psyched. Almost all the tourneys were done in the public Freeplay areas so you had to leave BYOC to participate in anything worthwhile. There was no major swag given out as in the previous year. I know Eviltree from Intel was there one afternoon but I missed him. There was mention of a possible LANFest at the Hudson, MA site in a couple of months but I have yet to confirm with him. Nothing posted on the Intel site as of yet.

The show itself was great. I wish I had attended more panels and events during the conference. I spent way to much time at BYOC hoping something decent was going to be scheduled. I'll probably be back again next year but will have to see if Intel takes control of the BYOC. It was still nice having a place to go hang and relax during the 3 days but I would not go with the expectation it is anything like the normal Intel LanFest events.

Next time lets sync up.

ltr

dev
User avatar
[JiF]Rhykin
JiF Member
Posts: 525
Joined: Tue Dec 12, 2006 9:25 pm
Location: USA
Contact:

Re: Battlefield 3 and PAX East 2011 Summary

Post by [JiF]Rhykin »

devnull wrote:I wish I had known you were going. I was there with two buds at the BYOC event. I only met one other person that had also attended NorEaster Intel LanFest ...of course I have now forgotten their name. There were no BDU or JiF folks as far as I know. I have to say that the BYOC was poorly run....no Intel folks were actively present even though they sponsored it. The PAX Enforcer folks attempted to manage the event but it was an epic FAIL. Intel attended PAX but it was mainly to showcase SSD's. I did speak with them about the BYOC event issues. My friend did win an SSD at their Assassins Creed competition so he was psyched. Almost all the tourneys were done in the public Freeplay areas so you had to leave BYOC to participate in anything worthwhile. There was no major swag given out as in the previous year. I know Eviltree from Intel was there one afternoon but I missed him.
Oof. That certainly sucks. Hopefully they'll fix that for next year.
There was mention of a possible LANFest at the Hudson, MA site in a couple of months but I have yet to confirm with him. Nothing posted on the Intel site as of yet.
Vokyous mentioned that this was recently posted on some sort of Facebook page, maybe for LANFest or LPANE, so it may happen later this summer. :viva:
The show itself was great. I wish I had attended more panels and events during the conference. I spent way to much time at BYOC hoping something decent was going to be scheduled. I'll probably be back again next year but will have to see if Intel takes control of the BYOC. It was still nice having a place to go hang and relax during the 3 days but I would not go with the expectation it is anything like the normal Intel LanFest events.
BYOC event has to be pretty huge to keep a decent number of people there and playing around the clock. Otherwise I'd imagine 50%+ of the people would be wandering around the convention at any given time. I'd still probably be up for the event next year, now that I have a computer and BF3 will be out by then too.
Next time lets sync up.
Definitely.
Image
Post Reply